Is there a need for mobile WiMAX — MobileMonday Global: Industry News

^{Too slow and expensive?} Is there a need for mobile WiMAX

10 Dec 2005 at 20:55 GMT Timo Poropudas

The hype around the new wireless broadband technology was flying thick and fast at the end of 2004. Performance claims of 75 Mbps speeds at distances up to 30 miles (48 km) were common.

Fast-forward a year, and, according to ABI Research’s latest WiMAX study, much of that hype has been replaced by a more realistic assessment of WiMAX’s performance and role.

According to the study’s author, senior analyst Philip Solis, “Those who made extravagant performance claims were just trying to get the wheels of the WiMAX bandwagon moving. Today, most commentators have no problem admitting that real-world speeds, depending as they do on the number of users per base station sector and their distance from the base-station, will be far slower than media reports had previously suggested.”

Given this new sense of realism, some question the need for WiMAX, certainly for 802.16e mobile WiMAX. In a recent press release, another ABI Research analyst, Alan Varghese, noted the nagging question: since they appear to meet many of the same demands, do we really need both cellular services and WiMAX?

In reply, Solis says “Mobile WiMAX will eventually form part of cellular providers’ networks, alleviating network congestion in urban areas. Providers will use it to offload part of the data traffic. At the same time, WiMAX is becoming a stepping-stone to 4G mobile services, which will be based on related technologies.”

WiMAX: The Market for 802.16-2004 and 802.16e examines the important drivers and inhibitors of this market, explaining mobile broadband technologies and how the WiMAX market will evolve.

“WISPS such as TowerStream and Clearwire will start offering services first,” says Solis. “When they change to it, that will kickstart the competition for cellular operators. However, these companies will only begin their migration when the cost of WiMAX equipment drops below that of the proprietary solutions they use now.”